Conclusion
With the condemnation of Origen, so much that is implied in reincarnation
was officially stigmatized as heresy that the possibility of a direct confrontation
with this belief was effectively removed from the church. In dismissing
Origen from its midst, the church only indirectly addressed itself to the
issue of reincarnation. The encounter with Origenism did, however,
draw decisive lines in the matter of preexistence, the resurrection of
the dead, and the relationship between body and soul. What
an examination of Origen and the church does achieve, however, is to show
where the reincarnationist will come into collision with the posture of
orthodoxy. The extent to which he may wish to retreat from
such a collision is of course a matter of personal conscience.
With the Council of 553 one can just about close the book on this entire
controversy within the church. There are merely two footnotes to
be added to the story, emerging from church councils in 1274 and 1439.
In the Council of Lyons, in 1274, it was stated that after death the soul
goes promptly either to heaven or to hell. On the Day of Judgment,
all will stand before the tribunal of Christ with their bodies to render
account of what they have done. The Council of Florence of 1439 uses
almost the same wording to describe the swift passage of the soul either
to heaven or to hell. Implicit in both of these councils is the
assumption that the soul does not again venture into physical bodies.
Back to Christian Reincarnation Index
|